As I trolled through my flickr favorites yesterday morning, it occurred to me that it is our passions (of their varying depths) that define us and provide a glimpse to our artistic values as they shift over time. Perhaps this is just the everyday motivation of collectors of things: the acquiring phase and the evaluation phase. We're basically magpies at heart and our collections help us see who we are or, were, at a moment that has slipped away forever.
I hope you can excuse my shallow musings but this is a blog after all! Artists are compelled by nature to bring the personal forward in the belief that there is something universal in their experience of life. So, blogging is a natural extension as we sort out Life out loud while trying to be elegant enough to not alienate the public we depend on. We sing for our supper every day.
There is the thing and there is the evidence of the thing.
Sometimes I wonder which is the more real or truthful representation of me. I can look at photos of myself or look in the mirror. I can look at old check registers or credit card statements and get a sense of my priorities and the places I've been. There are the boxes of Graphis annuals, PRINT and Creation magazine and shelves of books. Piles of sketchbooks and, of course folders filled with photographs. These are the physical evidence of my existence in and my interaction with the world.
I can talk to a therapist or a friend and through words try to fix some aspect of my uniqueness and possibly the beneficial effects of my being something other than an idea in my head. I can say something provocative and take note of others reactions to see whether I am only dreaming this whole idea of my life. And in quieter moments, like a detective. I can analyze the things I've collected over time. We are all anthropologists of the self.
Hopefully, I've left room in this text for you to take home this idea without burdening you with the particulars.
And since this is a blog for illustrators, I believe that illustrators process imagery at a higher rate than other artists. The world is literally our banquet. All is grist for the mill. We love anything that is graphic. We prefer (or used to) that it also smell of printing ink. Popular and obscure, cinematic and intimate: the more and more diverse, the better. This vast and often uncategorized personal catalog of stimulating images is our edge and our money in the bank. It is the well from which our surreal creativity bursts. We are illustrators: we speak to the people in the people's language and we renew that language each time we do our job.
Personally I gravitate to art that either makes me think "wow, I could do that" or "man, I wish I did that." As I try to redefine my personal style, I find looking at other artists' work both inspiring and frustrating. And in the ending, conflicting and confusing. I really want to create my own style...not mimic another's.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment Don!
ReplyDeleteBetween appreciation and copying is a very fine line to walk. It's really almost too much for me to think and worry about. For me, rather than fight influences, I feel best if I acknowledge and celebrate them; try to learn something about my own values through them. Or just express the type of love that is at the core of my practice.
There is a lot of mimicry in the field of illustration. It's a way of making a living I guess and often, the mimics are better businessmen than the person who originated the style! But essentially, I couldn't live that way.